general bound
General Bounds on Bayes Errors for Regression with Gaussian Processes
Based on a simple convexity lemma, we develop bounds for differ(cid:173) ent types of Bayesian prediction errors for regression with Gaussian processes. The basic bounds are formulated for a fixed training set. Simpler expressions are obtained for sampling from an input distri(cid:173) bution which equals the weight function of the covariance kernel, yielding asymptotically tight results. The results are compared with numerical experiments.
General Bounds on Bayes Errors for Regression with Gaussian Processes
Opper, Manfred, Vivarelli, Francesco
Based on a simple convexity lemma, we develop bounds for different types of Bayesian prediction errors for regression with Gaussian processes. The basic bounds are formulated for a fixed training set. Simpler expressions are obtained for sampling from an input distribution which equals the weight function of the covariance kernel, yielding asymptotically tight results. The results are compared with numerical experiments.
General Bounds on Bayes Errors for Regression with Gaussian Processes
Opper, Manfred, Vivarelli, Francesco
Based on a simple convexity lemma, we develop bounds for different types of Bayesian prediction errors for regression with Gaussian processes. The basic bounds are formulated for a fixed training set. Simpler expressions are obtained for sampling from an input distribution which equals the weight function of the covariance kernel, yielding asymptotically tight results. The results are compared with numerical experiments.
General Bounds on Bayes Errors for Regression with Gaussian Processes
Opper, Manfred, Vivarelli, Francesco
Based on a simple convexity lemma, we develop bounds for different typesof Bayesian prediction errors for regression with Gaussian processes. The basic bounds are formulated for a fixed training set. Simpler expressions are obtained for sampling from an input distribution whichequals the weight function of the covariance kernel, yielding asymptotically tight results. The results are compared with numerical experiments.